STREAMARCHIVERU
Mizkif vs Emiru: abuse allegations, OTK split and lawsuit
DevelopingОбновлено August 24, 2026 at 09:26 AM

Mizkif vs Emiru: abuse allegations, OTK split and lawsuit

Emiru publicly accused Mizkif of abuse, stalking, sexual assault and blackmail threats. Mizkif disputed major allegations and sued Emiru, Asmongold and OTK-linked companies. By July 13, 2026, Asmongold had been dismissed, corporate claims were stayed and the federal case against Emiru continued.

AsmongoldParticipantAsmongoldMZParticipantMizkifOTKParticipantOne True KingEMParticipantEmiruKGParticipantKing Gaming LabsMTParticipantMythic Talent Management

Timeline

63 events
Start of the conflictYOUTUBE · INITIALPrimary source

Emiru publicly accused Mizkif of abuse and sexual assault

Emiru hosted a livestream describing her past relationship with Mizkif and accused him of psychological and domestic abuse, stalking and harassment, sexual assault and threats of blackmail. She also described controlling behavior and alleged that he had threatened a retaliatory smear campaign if she spoke publicly. The allegations are statements made by Emiru and have not been adjudicated as true by a court. A stable copy of the statement was later uploaded to her YouTube channel as 'the last three years of my life [TW: mizkif]'. The June 2026 federal report and recommendation independently identifies October 25 as the date of the relevant livestream.

YouTube02:18Video sourcethe last three years of my life [TW: mizkif]Open on the platform ↗
All sources2
1the last three years of my life [TW: mizkif]YouTube · VideoPrimary source2Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate JudgeFederal court record mirror · LinkConfirmation
Checked October 24, 2025 at 04:00 PM
ResponseYOUTUBE · RESPONSEPrimary source

Mizkif published his response to Emiru's allegations

Mizkif responded publicly in a video titled 'The Truth...'. He disputed Emiru's account and denied the most serious allegations. In his response he acknowledged controlling behavior, including attempting to influence what Emiru wore, whether she travelled without him and who she associated with. He also acknowledged punching walls and slamming doors during conflict while presenting his own account of the relationship. Those admissions and counterclaims are Mizkif's own statements and do not independently establish the full circumstances of the relationship.

YouTube04:36Video sourceThe Truth...Open on the platform ↗
All sources2
1The Truth...YouTube · VideoPrimary source2One of the biggest streamers on Twitch is trying to take Asmongold and Emiru to court over defamation claimsPC Gamer · LinkSecondary source
Checked October 25, 2025 at 04:00 PM
ReactionTIMES OF INDIA · REACTIONVerified by the editors

Other creators published separate allegations about Mizkif

In the immediate aftermath of Emiru's statement, reports documented separate public accusations from creators including Quqco, AriaSaki and BogWytch. The allegations concerned different alleged interactions and conduct rather than a single shared incident. The complete original permalink chain for every creator was not recovered during this research, so this event records the existence of the reported public allegations through secondary coverage rather than treating their contents as independently established facts.

All female streamers who've accused Mizkif of sexual assault, harassment, and misconduct ↗
Checked October 25, 2025 at 04:00 PM
ReactionTIMES OF INDIA · REACTIONVerified by the editors

Asmongold said Mizkif's OTK removal had been decided earlier

During an October 26 livestream, Asmongold said that the decision concerning Mizkif's removal from OTK had been made before Emiru's public allegations and was based on a different matter. He also said he had permission from the person most affected by the earlier issue to reveal the reason if necessary. Asmongold did not publicly establish the complete underlying reason in the material recovered here. Mizkif's later amended complaint separately cited this October 26 livestream as the principal identified source of allegedly defamatory statements by Asmongold.

Asmongold promises to expose real reason Mizkif was removed from OTK after Emiru abuse claims ↗
All sources2
1Asmongold promises to expose real reason Mizkif was removed from OTK after Emiru abuse claimsTimes of India · LinkSecondary source2Report and Recommendation describing the October 26 Hoyt livestreamFederal court record mirror · LinkConfirmation
Checked October 25, 2025 at 04:00 PM
ResponseX · RESPONSEPrimary source

OTK publicly supported Emiru and said Mizkif held no stake

OTK published a statement saying it fully supported Emiru. The organization also stated that its relationship with Mizkif had been terminated 'some time ago' for reasons unrelated to the recent allegations and that he held no stake in OTK or its other companies. Mizkif's later amended federal complaint presented a different legal account of his ownership position and alleged that OTK sent a termination and divestment letter immediately after Emiru's stream. Those competing descriptions of the corporate relationship became part of the contract litigation and should not be treated as resolved by the public OTK statement alone.

Public postOTK statement supporting Emiru and addressing Mizkif's relationship with the organizationOriginal post ↗
All sources2
1OTK statement supporting Emiru and addressing Mizkif's relationship with the organizationX · PostPrimary source2OTK comes out in support of Emiru and confirms Mizkif's terminationDexerto · LinkSecondary source
Checked October 26, 2025 at 04:00 PM
UpdateJUSTIA · UPDATEVerified by the editors

Mizkif filed a federal lawsuit against Emiru, Asmongold and OTK-linked companies

Matthew Misrendino, also known publicly as Matthew Rinaudo or Mizkif, and Mizkif Enterprises LLC filed case 1:25-cv-01773 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. Defendants included Emily Beth Schunk, Zack Hoyt, OTK Media, Mythic Talent Management and King Gaming Labs. The amended litigation later contained common-law defamation claims against Schunk and Hoyt, breach-of-contract claims involving OTK and King, and declaratory-judgment claims involving OTK, Mythic and King. The complaint alleged that Emiru and Asmongold made false defamatory statements and challenged corporate attempts to divest Mizkif of interests or enforce contractual obligations. These were plaintiffs' allegations, not judicial findings.

Mizkif Enterprises LLC et al v. Schunk et al, Case 1:2025cv01773 ↗
All sources2
1Mizkif Enterprises LLC et al v. Schunk et al, Case 1:2025cv01773Justia · LinkConfirmation2One of the biggest streamers on Twitch is trying to take Asmongold and Emiru to court over defamation claimsPC Gamer · LinkSecondary source
Checked November 2, 2025 at 04:00 PM
ReactionTIMES OF INDIA · REACTIONVerified by the editors

Asmongold publicly acknowledged the lawsuit

Asmongold publicly addressed being named in Mizkif's lawsuit but kept his comments limited and avoided a detailed public defense at that stage. The response confirmed that he was aware of the litigation and was treating it as an active legal matter. The report is secondary and a stable permalink to the complete original stream segment was not recovered.

Twitch streamer Asmongold finally speaks on Mizkif lawsuit but keeps his words measured and vague ↗
Checked November 5, 2025 at 04:00 PM
UpdateJUSTIA · UPDATEVerified by the editors

Mizkif filed notice of intent to seek a spoliation instruction

The federal docket records a notice by the plaintiffs stating an intent to seek a spoliation instruction. A media exhibit was submitted to the court in connection with the filing the following day. The publicly indexed docket entry confirms the filing but does not provide enough accessible context to establish what evidence the plaintiffs alleged had been lost, destroyed or altered, or whether the court accepted the underlying argument.

Federal docket entries for December 11-12, 2025 ↗
Checked December 10, 2025 at 04:00 PM
UpdateJUSTIA · UPDATEVerified by the editors

OTK, Mythic and King moved to compel arbitration and stay litigation

OTK Media, Mythic Talent Management and King Gaming Labs filed an opposed motion asking the federal court to compel arbitration and stay the litigation. The dispute centered on the arbitration provisions in Mizkif's Representation Agreement with Mythic and how the agreement affected the related OTK and King claims. This motion later became one of the three core motions addressed by the June 2026 report and recommendation.

Docket 17: Opposed Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Litigation ↗
All sources2
1Docket 17: Opposed Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay LitigationJustia · LinkConfirmation2Report and Recommendation describing the corporate defendants' arbitration motionFederal court record mirror · LinkConfirmation
Checked December 22, 2025 at 04:00 PM
ReactionTIMES OF INDIA · REACTIONVerified by the editors

Mizkif publicly criticized OTK after his departure

While discussing later developments around OTK, Mizkif publicly argued that the organization had lost relevance after his departure and revisited tensions surrounding his relationship with the group. The comments were not a court filing and did not directly resolve the ownership or contract dispute. They document continued public friction between Mizkif and his former organization after the lawsuit was filed.

Mizkif claims OTK lost relevance after his exit as old tensions resurface ↗
Checked December 30, 2025 at 04:00 PM
ResponseJUSTIA · RESPONSEVerified by the editors

Mizkif opposed the corporate defendants' arbitration motion

Mizkif filed an opposition to the motion by OTK, Mythic and King seeking arbitration and a stay. The filing challenged the attempt to move the corporate branch of the dispute out of the federal litigation. The court later accepted the opposition after addressing its filing timing and ultimately considered the arbitration issue on the merits.

Plaintiffs' response in opposition to motion to compel arbitration ↗
Checked January 7, 2026 at 04:00 PM
ResponseJUSTIA · RESPONSEVerified by the editors

Asmongold filed his first motion to dismiss

Zack Hoyt filed a motion seeking dismissal of Mizkif's defamation claim. The motion began the briefing that was later superseded by an amended motion after Mizkif filed a First Amended Complaint. The filing was a defense request for dismissal, not a ruling on the alleged statements.

Zack Hoyt motion to dismiss ↗
Checked January 7, 2026 at 04:00 PM
UpdateJUSTIA · UPDATEVerified by the editors

Mizkif filed the First Amended Complaint

Mizkif filed a First Amended Complaint against Emiru, Asmongold, OTK, Mythic and King Gaming Labs. The filing became the operative pleading analyzed in the later June report and recommendation and included an OTK letter as an exhibit. The amended complaint alleged defamation against Schunk and Hoyt, breach of contract against OTK and King, and sought declaratory relief concerning OTK, Mythic and King. Its factual assertions remained allegations by the plaintiffs.

Docket 25: First Amended Complaint ↗
All sources2
1Docket 25: First Amended ComplaintJustia · LinkConfirmation2Report and Recommendation summarizing the First Amended ComplaintFederal court record mirror · LinkConfirmation
Checked January 21, 2026 at 04:00 PM
ResponseJUSTIA · RESPONSEVerified by the editors

OTK, Mythic and King replied on the arbitration dispute

The corporate defendants submitted their reply supporting the request to compel arbitration and stay the federal litigation. The filing completed another stage of briefing on whether the contract-related claims should continue in court. The issue remained unresolved until the court considered it later in 2026.

Corporate defendants' reply supporting arbitration and stay ↗
Checked January 21, 2026 at 04:00 PM
ResponseJUSTIA · RESPONSEVerified by the editors

Mizkif responded to Asmongold's first dismissal motion

Mizkif filed a response opposing Zack Hoyt's initial motion to dismiss the defamation claim. Because the complaint was amended, the parties subsequently filed an updated round of briefing addressing the new operative pleading.

Plaintiffs' response to Zack Hoyt's motion to dismiss ↗
Checked January 21, 2026 at 04:00 PM
ResponseJUSTIA · RESPONSEVerified by the editors

Asmongold replied in support of dismissal

Zack Hoyt submitted a reply supporting dismissal of Mizkif's defamation claim. The filing continued the procedural dispute over whether the complaint provided sufficient context and identification of the statements Mizkif alleged were defamatory.

Zack Hoyt reply in support of motion to dismiss ↗
Checked January 28, 2026 at 04:00 PM
ResponseJUSTIA · RESPONSEVerified by the editors

OTK, Mythic and King responded to the amended pleading

OTK, Mythic and King filed their response following Mizkif's First Amended Complaint while continuing to pursue the arbitration and stay arguments already before the court. The corporate dispute remained separate from the individual defamation claims against Emiru and Asmongold.

Corporate defendants' filing following the First Amended Complaint ↗
Checked February 4, 2026 at 04:00 PM
ResponseJUSTIA · RESPONSEVerified by the editors

Asmongold filed an amended motion to dismiss

Zack Hoyt filed an amended motion asking the court to dismiss the defamation claim in the First Amended Complaint. In the alternative, he requested a more definite statement identifying the allegedly defamatory remarks and their context. Public reporting on the filing said Hoyt's defense argued that his commentary responded to Mizkif's own public statements and that the complaint omitted necessary context.

Docket 32: Zack Hoyt amended motion to dismiss ↗
All sources2
1Docket 32: Zack Hoyt amended motion to dismissJustia · LinkConfirmation2Asmongold asks court to dismiss Mizkif's defamation lawsuit as he was repeating his own wordsDexerto · LinkSecondary source
Checked February 4, 2026 at 04:00 PM
ResponseJUSTIA · RESPONSEVerified by the editors

Mizkif opposed Asmongold's amended dismissal motion

Mizkif filed his opposition to Zack Hoyt's amended motion to dismiss. The parties continued disputing whether the alleged October 26 statements were sufficiently identified and capable of supporting a defamation claim.

Plaintiffs' opposition to Zack Hoyt's amended motion to dismiss ↗
Checked February 18, 2026 at 04:00 PM
ResponseJUSTIA · RESPONSEVerified by the editors

Asmongold completed briefing on his amended dismissal motion

Zack Hoyt filed a reply supporting his amended dismissal motion. The motion was then fully briefed for the court's later consideration.

Zack Hoyt reply supporting amended motion to dismiss ↗
Checked February 25, 2026 at 04:00 PM
ResponseJUSTIA · RESPONSEVerified by the editors

Emiru moved to dismiss Mizkif's defamation claim

Emily Schunk filed a motion asking the federal court to dismiss Mizkif's defamation claim. Her filing included a video and transcript of the October livestream, which the magistrate judge later considered because the material was central to the claim. Emiru argued, among other points, that the statements did not establish an actionable defamation claim and that the challenged account included opinion or her protected emotional characterization. The motion did not itself determine the truth of the underlying events.

Docket 39: Emily Schunk motion to dismiss First Amended Complaint ↗
All sources2
1Docket 39: Emily Schunk motion to dismiss First Amended ComplaintJustia · LinkConfirmation2Report and Recommendation discussing Schunk's motionFederal court record mirror · LinkConfirmation
Checked March 2, 2026 at 04:00 PM
StatementTIMES OF INDIA · STATEMENTVerified by the editors

Mizkif publicly described the personal impact of the allegations

Mizkif discussed the dispute during a livestream and said that the allegations had severely affected his reputation and made him afraid to go outside because people publicly labelled him a rapist. He continued to characterize Emiru's account as false. The statements describe Mizkif's own experience and legal position. They do not establish whether the allegations were true or false.

Mizkif breaks down on livestream and discusses the effect of Emiru allegations ↗
Checked March 3, 2026 at 04:00 PM
StatementTIMES OF INDIA · STATEMENTVerified by the editors

Mizkif said Emiru should face jail time over the accusations

During another livestream, Mizkif argued that Emiru should face criminal consequences for what he characterized as false accusations and said the conduct should mean jail time. This was Mizkif's public opinion and allegation. The federal case at issue is civil litigation, and the statement does not establish that Emiru committed a crime or faced a criminal charge.

Mizkif breaks down on livestream and demands jail time for Emiru over allegations ↗
Checked March 5, 2026 at 04:00 PM
ResponseJUSTIA · RESPONSEVerified by the editors

Mizkif opposed Emiru's motion to dismiss

Mizkif filed his response opposing Emiru's motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint. His filing argued that the defamation claim was sufficiently pleaded to proceed. The opposition was an advocacy filing by the plaintiff rather than an independent determination of the truth of the underlying allegations.

Plaintiffs' response opposing Emily Schunk's motion to dismiss ↗
Checked March 16, 2026 at 04:00 PM
ResponseJUSTIA · RESPONSEVerified by the editors

Emiru replied in support of dismissal

Emiru submitted her reply supporting the motion to dismiss. The filing completed the principal briefing on her request before the court later referred the motion to Magistrate Judge Susan Hightower. Related audiovisual material was also lodged with the court as part of the motion record.

Emily Schunk reply supporting motion to dismiss ↗
Checked March 23, 2026 at 04:00 PM
StatementTIMES OF INDIA · STATEMENTVerified by the editors

Mizkif accused Emiru of intentionally delaying the case

Mizkif discussed the litigation on stream and claimed that Emiru was intentionally delaying the process so that public attention would fade. He also made the personal claim that she had wanted him to die and revisited the history of their relationship and time around OTK. These are allegations and interpretations expressed by Mizkif. The available source does not independently establish Emiru's motive for litigation timing or the claim concerning her intentions.

Mizkif breaks silence on Emiru lawsuit delay and makes claim she wanted him to die ↗
Checked March 26, 2026 at 04:00 PM
UpdateJUSTIA · UPDATEVerified by the editors

The district court referred the three core motions to the magistrate judge

The district court referred the corporate arbitration motion, Asmongold's amended motion to dismiss and Emiru's motion to dismiss to Magistrate Judge Susan Hightower for a report and recommendation. On the same date, Judge Robert Pitman denied a third party's request for leave to file an amicus brief. The referral moved the major pending motions toward the June 2026 report and recommendation.

April 28, 2026 motion referrals and amicus order ↗
Checked April 27, 2026 at 04:00 PM
UpdateJUSTIA · UPDATEVerified by the editors

The court ordered additional briefing on federal jurisdiction

Magistrate Judge Susan Hightower ordered the plaintiffs to provide allegations establishing the domicile of Mizkif, Emiru and Asmongold as of the filing date because the First Amended Complaint had described residence rather than domicile for purposes of diversity jurisdiction. The later June report stated that the court was satisfied that complete diversity existed after the supplemental briefing.

Order for Briefing Re Subject Matter Jurisdiction ↗
Checked May 25, 2026 at 04:00 PM
UpdateFEDERAL COURT RECORD MIRROR · UPDATEVerified by the editors

Magistrate judge recommended keeping the Emiru claim while dismissing Asmongold

Magistrate Judge Susan Hightower issued a report and recommendation addressing the three central pending motions. She recommended granting OTK, Mythic and King's motion to compel arbitration and staying Counts One and Three pending arbitration. She recommended denying Emiru's motion to dismiss, while ordering Mizkif to provide a more definite statement containing the exact disputed quotes, why he alleged each quote was false and how it harmed him. She also recommended granting Asmongold's amended motion and dismissing the defamation claim against him without prejudice. For the Emiru claim, the court was applying the Rule 12(b)(6) pleading standard and accepting well-pleaded allegations as true for purposes of the motion. The recommendation therefore did not determine that Mizkif's allegations were true or that Emiru's accusations were false.

Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge ↗
Checked June 14, 2026 at 04:00 PM
ReactionNDTV · REACTIONVerified by the editors

Asmongold said his legal fees had exceeded $180,000

Asmongold publicly said that he had spent more than $180,000 in legal fees dealing with Mizkif's lawsuit. He also discussed the broader effect that litigation can have on how streamers talk about allegations and why creators increasingly use qualifying language such as 'allegedly'. The dollar figure is Asmongold's own publicly reported estimate and was not independently verified through billing records.

Asmongold Says Lawsuit Filed by Mizkif Is Still Active, Claims Legal Fees Have Exceeded USD 180,000 ↗
Checked June 15, 2026 at 04:00 PM
ResponseDEXERTO · RESPONSEVerified by the editors

Mizkif objected to the arbitration and stay recommendation

Mizkif filed objections challenging the portion of the June report recommending arbitration and a stay for the corporate claims. Reporting on the filing states that he did not object to the recommendations concerning denial of Emiru's motion to dismiss, the requirement for a more definite statement or dismissal of the claim against Asmongold without prejudice. The objection therefore focused the remaining disagreement with the report on the corporate arbitration branch.

Judge sides with Mizkif to continue lawsuit against Emiru but not Asmongold ↗
Checked June 28, 2026 at 04:00 PM
StatementYOUTUBE · STATEMENTPrimary source

Mizkif released 'Emiru Lied, Part 1'

Mizkif published a roughly 45-minute video titled 'Emiru Lied, Part 1'. He again denied Emiru's allegations, discussed private messages and other material he said contradicted parts of her account, and walked viewers through the June court recommendation. Mizkif explicitly acknowledged that allowing the case to move forward was not a verdict. The messages, interpretations and factual assertions he presented in the video remain his evidence and arguments in a disputed case rather than judicial findings.

YouTube04:36Video sourceEmiru Lied, Part 1Open on the platform ↗
All sources2
1Emiru Lied, Part 1YouTube · VideoPrimary source2Judge sides with Mizkif to continue lawsuit against Emiru but not AsmongoldDexerto · LinkSecondary source
Checked July 6, 2026 at 04:00 PM
UpdateJUSTIA · UPDATEVerified by the editors

Court confirmed Asmongold's dismissal and the corporate stay

Magistrate Judge Susan Hightower ordered Mizkif and Emiru to confer and submit a joint proposed scheduling order with specific dates by July 31. A footnote in the order states that District Judge Robert Pitman had dismissed the claims against Zack Hoyt and stayed the case as to OTK Media, Mythic Talent Management and King Gaming Labs in Docket 57. The order therefore confirms that the earlier recommendations concerning Asmongold and the corporate defendants had moved beyond the recommendation stage. The remaining publicly visible federal litigation was proceeding between Mizkif and Emiru. The full text of Docket 57 was not recovered during this research.

Order requiring Mizkif and Emiru to submit a joint proposed scheduling order ↗
Checked July 12, 2026 at 04:00 PM
UpdateEMIRU.GG · UPDATEVerified by the editors

Emiru continued regular streaming after the latest court order

Emiru held another public stream after the July 13 federal court order. The available stream title focused on hanging out, reactions and variety gaming and did not mention Mizkif or the lawsuit.

Emiru stream updates ↗
Checked July 13, 2026 at 02:00 PM
UpdateSTREAMS CHARTS · UPDATEVerified by the editors

Mizkif continued streaming on Kick after the July court order

Mizkif held a separate Kick broadcast after the latest federal court development. The archived title concerned a viewer giveaway and an upcoming vacation. Emiru and the lawsuit were not mentioned in the available title.

Mizkif Kick stream history ↗
Checked July 13, 2026 at 02:00 PM
UpdateEMIRU.GG · UPDATEVerified by the editors

Emiru held another variety stream

Emiru continued public streaming with another broadcast focused on reactions and variety gaming. The available title does not mention Mizkif or the federal litigation.

Emiru stream updates ↗
Checked July 14, 2026 at 02:00 PM
UpdateSTREAMS CHARTS · UPDATEVerified by the editors

Mizkif held another Kick broadcast before his vacation

Mizkif held another Kick stream before his planned break. The available title does not mention Emiru, OTK or the lawsuit and does not establish a new position on the dispute.

Mizkif Kick stream history ↗
Checked July 14, 2026 at 02:00 PM
ReactionKICKARCHIVE · REACTIONVerified by the editors

ChudLogic held a long stream covering the Mizkif, Emiru and Asmongold dispute

ChudLogic held a multi-hour broadcast whose title explicitly included MIZKIF EMIRU ASMONGOLD DRAMA. The material confirms continued third-party public commentary about the conflict after the July 13 court order. The complete segment was not independently transcribed, so no more specific claim from the broadcast is attributed here.

MIZKIF EMIRU ASMONGOLD DRAMA - NEW NUX TAKU DISCORD DRAMA? - BODYCAMS ↗
Checked July 14, 2026 at 02:00 PM
UpdateEMIRU.GG · UPDATEVerified by the editors

Emiru continued public streaming without a Mizkif-specific title

Emiru held another public broadcast after the court's July scheduling order. The available stream metadata does not contain a direct reference to Mizkif or the lawsuit.

Emiru stream updates ↗
Checked July 15, 2026 at 02:00 PM
UpdateSTREAMS CHARTS · UPDATEVerified by the editors

Mizkif continued regular Kick streaming

Mizkif held another short Kick broadcast before his vacation. The archived title does not mention Emiru or the litigation and does not establish a new conflict-specific statement.

Mizkif Kick stream history ↗
Checked July 15, 2026 at 02:00 PM
StatementSPEAKRJ · STATEMENTVerified by the editors

Mizkif published another Emiru-specific YouTube video

Mizkif's YouTube channel index records a new July 17 upload whose visible title begins Regarding Emirus False Al... The publication directly concerns Emiru and therefore represents a new conflict-specific public statement after the July 13 court order. The full title, stable direct video permalink and complete contents were not recovered during this research, so no specific additional allegation from the video is attributed here.

Mizkif YouTube media statistics showing July 17 Emiru-specific upload ↗
Checked July 16, 2026 at 02:00 PM
UpdateEMIRU.GG · UPDATEVerified by the editors

Emiru continued regular public streaming

Emiru held another public stream on July 17. The available metadata does not contain a direct reference to Mizkif or the federal lawsuit.

Emiru stream updates ↗
Checked July 16, 2026 at 02:00 PM
UpdateSTREAMS CHARTS · UPDATEVerified by the editors

Mizkif announced a streaming break for his trip

Mizkif held a Kick broadcast whose title said he was leaving for a trip and expected to take a break until July 27. The available title does not mention Emiru or the litigation.

Mizkif Kick stream history ↗
Checked July 16, 2026 at 02:00 PM
UpdateEMIRU.GG · UPDATEVerified by the editors

Emiru continued variety streaming

Emiru held another public broadcast focused on reactions, gaming and Palworld. Mizkif is not mentioned in the available title.

Emiru stream updates ↗
Checked July 17, 2026 at 02:00 PM
UpdateSTREAMS CHARTS · UPDATEVerified by the editors

Mizkif streamed during his vacation

Mizkif held another Kick broadcast during his trip. The archived title referred to White Castle, gambling and the vacation. It does not mention Emiru or the lawsuit.

Mizkif Kick stream history ↗
Checked July 17, 2026 at 02:00 PM
UpdateEMIRU.GG · UPDATEVerified by the editors

Emiru held another Sub Sunday stream

Emiru continued public streaming with a Sub Sunday gaming broadcast. The available title does not mention Mizkif or indicate a new statement about the litigation.

Emiru stream updates ↗
Checked July 18, 2026 at 02:00 PM
UpdateSTREAMS CHARTS · UPDATEVerified by the editors

Mizkif held multiple vacation broadcasts

Mizkif held multiple Kick streams during his vacation, including another White Castle and gambling broadcast and a separate stream titled BELL LEARNING HOW TO RIDE A BIKE. The available titles do not mention Emiru or the lawsuit.

Mizkif Kick stream history ↗
Checked July 18, 2026 at 02:00 PM
UpdateSTREAMS CHARTS · UPDATEVerified by the editors

Mizkif continued vacation streaming

Mizkif held another Kick broadcast during his vacation. The available metadata does not contain a direct reference to Emiru, OTK or the federal litigation.

Mizkif Kick stream history ↗
Checked July 19, 2026 at 02:00 PM
UpdateSTREAMS CHARTS · UPDATEVerified by the editors

Mizkif held another vacation stream

Mizkif continued public Kick broadcasts during his trip. The available title stated vacation till 27th and did not mention Emiru or the lawsuit.

Mizkif Kick stream history ↗
Checked July 20, 2026 at 02:00 PM
UpdateEMIRU.GG · UPDATEVerified by the editors

Emiru streamed before San Diego Comic-Con

Emiru held another public broadcast focused on reactions, variety gaming and preparation for San Diego Comic-Con. Mizkif is not mentioned in the available title.

Emiru stream updates ↗
Checked July 21, 2026 at 02:00 PM
UpdateSTREAMS CHARTS · UPDATEVerified by the editors

Mizkif continued his vacation broadcasts

Mizkif held another Kick stream under the vacation till 27th title. The available metadata does not identify a new Emiru-specific statement.

Mizkif Kick stream history ↗
Checked July 21, 2026 at 02:00 PM
UpdateSTREAMS CHARTS · UPDATEVerified by the editors

Mizkif held another vacation stream

Mizkif continued his public Kick activity while traveling. The available title does not mention Emiru or the federal case.

Mizkif Kick stream history ↗
Checked July 22, 2026 at 02:00 PM
UpdateSTREAMS CHARTS · UPDATEVerified by the editors

Mizkif continued regular broadcasts during his trip

Mizkif held another vacation-era Kick broadcast. The available title does not contain a direct reference to Emiru, Asmongold, OTK or the lawsuit.

Mizkif Kick stream history ↗
Checked July 23, 2026 at 02:00 PM
UpdateEMIRU.GG · UPDATEVerified by the editors

Emiru streamed from San Diego Comic-Con

Emiru held a substantial San Diego Comic-Con broadcast involving Alinity and AriaSaki, including convention and cosplay-related content. The available title does not mention Mizkif or the lawsuit.

Emiru stream updates ↗
Checked July 24, 2026 at 02:00 PM
UpdateSTREAMS CHARTS · UPDATEVerified by the editors

Mizkif streamed on the final stage of his vacation

Mizkif held a Kick broadcast titled last day in wildwood - vacation till 27th. The available title does not mention Emiru or the federal litigation.

Mizkif Kick stream history ↗
Checked July 24, 2026 at 02:00 PM
UpdateSTREAMS CHARTS · UPDATEVerified by the editors

Mizkif held another final vacation broadcast

Mizkif held another public Kick stream under the last day in wildwood vacation title. The stream metadata does not directly reference Emiru or the lawsuit.

Mizkif Kick stream history ↗
Checked July 25, 2026 at 02:00 PM
UpdateSTREAMS CHARTS · UPDATEVerified by the editors

Mizkif returned home and announced the resumption of regular streams

Mizkif held another Kick broadcast titled back home, streams start wed - join discord !discord. The material confirms continued public activity following his vacation. The available title does not contain a direct Emiru-specific statement.

Mizkif Kick channel history ↗
Checked July 26, 2026 at 02:00 PM
ReactionSTREAMS CHARTS · REACTIONVerified by the editors

A third-party Kick stream continued covering Asmongold and Mizkif

The kick_clipz channel held a public broadcast whose title explicitly referenced Asmongold vs Mizkif. The material confirms continued third-party commentary after Asmongold's dismissal from the federal case. The indexed metadata does not provide enough context to establish the claims made during the segment.

kick_clipz stream history ↗
Checked July 26, 2026 at 02:00 PM
ReactionX · REACTIONPrimary source

Mizkif said he paid to promote his Emiru response to Asmongold's YouTube audience

After Asmongold viewers flagged ads promoting Mizkif's video "Emiru Lied, Part 1" on Asmongold's YouTube content, Mizkif publicly said he had spent $45 on the campaign about a week earlier. He said the purpose was to put his response in front of Asmongold's audience because Asmongold had not watched the video. Mizkif again argued that court records and Emiru's own statements supported his position. Asmongold publicly criticized the tactic. Mizkif's statements are his claims about the underlying allegations and do not establish that Emiru lied.

Public postMizkif response about the paid promotion of Emiru Lied, Part 1Original post ↗
All sources3
1Mizkif response about the paid promotion of Emiru Lied, Part 1X · PostPrimary source2Mizkif explanation for targeting Asmongold's viewers with the adX · PostPrimary source3Asmongold responds as Mizkif admits to buying ads on his YouTube videosDexerto · LinkSecondary source
Checked July 27, 2026 at 07:00 AM
ReactionYOUTUBE · REACTIONPrimary source

Asmongold publicly discussed his dismissal from Mizkif's lawsuit

Asmongold TV published a video titled "He sued to shut me up. He just lost.." in which Asmongold reacted to legal analysis of the July court rulings. He described the dismissal of the claim against him as vindication, acknowledged that the dismissal was without prejudice, and said he would limit his comments about Emiru's remaining case. The video also discussed the continuing requirement that Mizkif identify the specific statements he alleges were defamatory.

YouTube01:42Video sourceHe sued to shut me up. He just lost..Open on the platform ↗
All sources2
1He sued to shut me up. He just lost..YouTube · VideoPrimary source2Transcript of He sued to shut me up. He just lost..YouTLDR · LinkConfirmation
Checked July 27, 2026 at 07:00 AM
UpdateYOUTUBE · UPDATEPrimary source

WestJett published commentary on the Mizkif and Asmongold ad dispute

WestJett published a commentary video covering Mizkif's paid YouTube promotion targeting Asmongold's audience and framed it as a continuation of the public dispute involving Mizkif, Asmongold and Emiru. The video is third-party commentary and does not independently establish the truth of the parties' allegations.

YouTube02:18Video sourceAsmongold Just Dropped the Mizkif FilesOpen on the platform ↗
Checked July 27, 2026 at 07:00 AM
ReactionMAFKR · REACTIONVerified by the editors

Mizkif publicly criticized Asmongold's recent takes

A public clip surfaced during coverage of Asmongold's August Twitch suspension in which Mizkif described why he thought Asmongold had "lost his mind" with what he characterized as "insane takes." The recovered index does not expose the full original clip, so the specific examples Mizkif discussed cannot be independently established from the available material. The clip documents a later direct public mention of Asmongold by Mizkif after the defamation claim against Asmongold was dismissed.

The Ban Is One Day Old. Here Is What ClarawrrXD, Mizkif, and Asmongold Himself Have Already Said About It. ↗
Checked August 7, 2026 at 07:00 AM
Latest updateUpdateLAWCLAIMCORNER · UPDATE2 confirmations

LawClaimCorner published an outdated procedural summary of the lawsuit

LawClaimCorner published a September 6 article summarizing the June magistrate recommendations and stating that the district judge's final ruling was still pending. That procedural description conflicts with the July 13 federal order, which states that Judge Robert Pitman had already dismissed Zack Hoyt and stayed the case as to OTK Media, Mythic Talent Management and King Gaming Labs. The article is therefore a new public commentary source, but it does not confirm the current procedural status.

Mizkif Lawsuit: Emiru's Defamation Claim Survives, Asmongold Recommended for Dismissal ↗
All sources2
1Mizkif Lawsuit: Emiru's Defamation Claim Survives, Asmongold Recommended for DismissalLawClaimCorner · LinkSecondary source2Filing 58: Order requiring a joint proposed scheduling orderJustia · LinkConfirmation
Checked September 6, 2026 at 07:00 AM
6
Asmongold vs Sneako: immigration, religion and Twitch suspensionShared participants: AsmongoldAsmongold vs Sneako: immigration, religion and Twitch suspension53 events · updated August 9, 2026 at 12:00 PMShared participants: Asmongold, MizkifPokimane vs Ninja: JiDion ban fallout and legal-threat dispute38 events · updated August 26, 2026 at 07:30 AMShared participants: AsmongoldSSSniperWolf vs Jacksfilms: reaction content, creator credit and home-address incident88 events · updated August 26, 2026 at 05:34 AMCategory: StreamersMikeFromPA vs Hutch / Tectone: Violent-Comments Controversy, Twitch Suspension and Boxing Challenge10 events · updated September 11, 2026 at 04:42 PMCategory: StreamersGH Rell RJ vs Joao Victor Goncalves: Livestream Harassment, Kick Ban and Police Investigation12 events · updated September 11, 2026 at 03:40 PMCategory: StreamersFaZe Banks vs. CORE Boys / Marlon: profitability dispute, private messages and personal attacks6 events · updated September 11, 2026 at 03:39 PM